Keep up to date with news related to the Chair in Public Finance.
Upcoming Roundtable: Measuring public sector productivity
There are many reasons for wanting to increase the rate of growth of public sector productivity. Trends such as an ageing workforce mean that a strategy of delivering output growth through increasing inputs will become less feasible. By allowing “more bang for each buck” higher rates of productivity growth can also bend down fiscal cost curves and help satisfy increasing expectations of quality by clients. Productivity growth is a key dimension of better public services.
Yet while more productivity may be a good thing it is not immediately clear how to best develop and use productivity measures. Over the last two decades national statisticians and others have made significant progress towards developing techniques for measuring public sector productivity. But – at least compared to the measured sector – this is still a developing field and there is a lack of an international consensus on key questions.
At this roundtable Norman and Patrick will discuss recent New Zealand and international work on measuring public sector productivity. A range of approaches – and their strengths and weaknesses – will be discussed with illustrative examples. Time will be set aside for interactive discussion with attendees.
Date: 10.30 – 12.00 noon, Friday, 24 March 2017
Venue: New Zealand Productivity Commission, Level 15, Fujitsu Tower, 141 The Terrace
Please note that places are limited and will be allocated on a first come, first served basis. Attendance will be confirmed by e-mail. The event will be held under the Chatham House rule.
Are tax cuts a good idea?
The following commentary is provided by Professor Norman Gemmell, Chair in Public Finance.
17 March 2017
Before John Key resigned as Prime Minister there were plenty of hints he favoured income tax cuts in 2017, while Finance Minister Bill English was rumoured to be less keen. So how will the partnership of English as Prime Minister and Steven Joyce as Finance Minister approach tax cuts and would they be a good idea?
Most voters probably now recognise that the economists’ adage ‘there is no such thing as a free lunch’ definitely applies to tax cuts. There are only three options if a government cuts taxes: it eats into its budget surplus—if it has one; it spends less on things it presumably thinks we need or want; or it borrows more now but raises tax later when the borrowing has to be repaid with interest. (Cutting tax rates but managing to raise more revenue is sometimes possible, but it’s pretty rare.)
So are tax cuts a good idea? Before answering that question, it is worth recalling that if the Government does nothing it will generally end up each year with more tax revenue than the year before. That is because, whenever wages and salaries go up (whether to compensate for price rises since the last wage increase or because real wages rise), the income tax we pay goes up more rapidly, due to the progressive nature of the tax schedule and some taxpayers shifting into higher tax brackets. Read more
The myth of the shrinking state? What does the data show about the size of the state in New Zealand?
Norman Gemmell and Derek Gill
The paper explores the urban myth that the economic reforms of the late 1980 and 1990s reduced the size of the state. It uses a variety of lenses – the state as taxer, spender, producer, employer, investor, and steward – to assess how the size and shape of the state has changed.
It finds despite the rhetoric, there is little sign in the data of the hollowing out or shrinking of the state, though some changes following the 1980s reforms such as the reduction in the state role in the production of market goods and services have persisted. Instead, we find some changes in the shape of the state. View the article.
Tax reform in developing countries
A recent publication which combines three decades of research on tax reform in developing countries. Edited by James Alm and Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, the collection includes works from Michael Keen, Thomas Piketty, Joseph Stiglitz and our own Norman Gemmell.
These pages describe the activities and personal views of the Chair in Public Finance. They should not be attributed to Victoria University of Wellington or the sponsors of the Chair.