Research Highlights
Competitive Advantage
The foundations of competitive advantage in CANZ exemplars has been found
to be unusually broad. Typically, these firms have established several
of the sources that are capable of supporting advantage over the long
term:
- high-quality relationships of mutual dependency, trust and benefit
with business partners, employees and customers;
- positions of market leadership gained through innovation that are
locked-in before competitors can respond;
- mastery and integration of multiple technologies;
- organisation processes that foster learning;
- distinctive organisation cultures that support the above; and
- a balance in the portfolio of capabilities so that each part of the
organisation is able to support the demands placed on it by others.
Above all, these firms create strong coherences between all their activities
that delivers a coherent value package to the customer, which other firms
find hard to achieve.
Page
Top
Internationalisation
The CANZ project has found that patterns of internationalisation evident
in the CANZ exemplars are, in several important respects, opposite to
theories developed for much larger economies. Two distinct internationalisation
strategies are evident:
- Global leaders establish positions of global leadership for tightly
focussed products. In every case, proprietary New Zealand-developed
innovation has been the launch vehicle into global markets.
- Regional leaders have built positions of market leadership on both
sides of the Tasman with a product scope that is broader than global
leaders. They derive advantage from their ability to integrate capabilities
across this broad range.
Contrary to overseas theory, it is global leaders who keep their production
consolidated at home in New Zealand, and regional leaders who have a preference
for direct representation of their products offshore.
These two internationalisation strategies have their own distinct logic.
Moving from regional to global leadership is not an automatic or ‘natural’
progression, but rather involves radical change into a fundamentally different
pattern of strategic
coherences.
Page
Top
The Origins of Advantage
In every case, CANZ exemplars have found ways to create international
advantage from aspects of their experience that are distinctive to New
Zealand. For example, some attributes of New Zealand culture have been
repeatedly cited as helping these firms create value in ways that much
larger competitors find hard to match:
- Ingenuity — an ability to do more with less
- Self-reliance — a readiness to have a go and get things done
- All-rounders, based on a broader base of experience than is common
in larger more specialised companies
- Open communication and the expectation of an open society facilitates
learning and the creation of . .
- . . . broad-based networks that engage a wide range of skills in
creating customer value.
Page
Top
The Evolution of Capabilities
Several development patterns have been salient in the evolution of competitive
capabilities in the CANZ exemplars:
- Search and exploration for positions of advantage has involved many
low-cost, broad-cast efforts, followed by focussed development of markets
and products that show promise. We call these search patterns sow and
reap and focus and grow.
- When success strikes these globally very small firms, the result
is a period of intense growth that we call the gusher during which sales
double and re-double every year for a period of 3-4 years. These are
periods of great potential but also of great danger.
- Limitations of size are overcome by extensive use of networks of
business partners, to extend firms’ capabilities in technology,
production and marketing.
- Capabilities are built up in a process of constant leverage in which
one position of advantage is used to reach for another. A portfolio
of world-class competitive capabilities is not reached quickly, and
its shape today is shaped by the pattern of its past successes.
- Above all, CANZ exemplars have shown an ability to radically re-invent
themselves on several occasions in their history. These periods are
relatively brief (a couple of years or so) and involve large-scale change
to the pattern of coherences that integrate the firm’s activities.
We call these vital periods of re-invention de/re-coherencing
|